Russians are massively abandoning toilet paper - an innovative substitute has surfaced instead
In the realm of personal hygiene, Russia is seeing a shift in preferences, with traditional toilet paper being gradually replaced by bidets, hygiene nozzles, and wet wipes.
Effectiveness
When it comes to cleanliness, bidets and hygiene nozzles, which use water for cleaning, are generally more effective than dry toilet paper. Water, being a natural cleanser, provides a more thorough and gentle cleanse. Wet wipes can also be more efficient at removing residue than dry paper, but they may cause skin irritation if not designed for sensitive skin or if overused.
Cost
Toilet paper is the most affordable option upfront, but bidets and hygiene nozzles, which require installation costs and possibly plumbing adjustments, are more expensive initially. Wet wipes, on the other hand, are more costly per use and are a recurring expense.
Environmental Impact
Toilet paper production consumes a significant amount of water, energy, and trees, and generates waste. Disposable wet wipes, often containing plastics, do not biodegrade easily, contributing substantially to environmental pollution and sewage blockages. Bidets and hygiene nozzles use water but significantly reduce or eliminate paper waste, potentially lowering environmental impact if water usage is efficient.
In Russia, public toilets often face unique infrastructure challenges, such as lack of partitions and certain regional practices with toilet paper disposal. However, detailed data on bidet or wet wipe usage in Russia is scarce.
Benefits and Drawbacks
Using bidets, nozzles, and wet wipes can help prevent skin irritation and proctological issues. They can also reduce strain on the environment by reducing paper consumption, which means fewer trees are cut down. However, attempts to flush unsuitable paper and wet wipes can lead to sewage system failures, with excessive flushing causing thousands of such failures annually.
In some Russian households, people use paper only for patting, significantly reducing usage. This practice, combined with the increasing use of bidets, nozzles, and wet wipes, can help reduce environmental impact.
In conclusion, while bidets and hygiene nozzles are generally more effective and environmentally friendly than traditional toilet paper, they entail higher initial costs. Wet wipes offer convenience and cleaning benefits but pose environmental risks greater than toilet paper. The precise situation in Russia remains to be seen, as detailed data on usage patterns is lacking.
Science has shown that bidets and hygiene nozzles, which are popular in environmental-science involving sustainable-living, are more effective and efficient at cleaning than dry toilet paper, reducing the need for the vast resources consumption associated with toilet paper production. On the other hand, home-and-garden products such as wet wipes, while convenient, can cause skin irritation and contribute to environmental pollution if not designed for sensitive skin or biodegradable.
